Giving begins with knowing what we believe.
This guided reflection captures your interests, values, and philanthropic preferences. Your responses shape a shared profile that we can use to design a stronger giving strategy.
Let's begin with your name.
A small thing, but every act of giving begins with a person. Knowing who is at the table helps us shape a strategy that reflects you.
Please enter your name.
This helps us attribute your perspective and follow up with thanks.
Are you speaking for others, too?
Family offices often hold many voices in trust. If your answers represent more than one perspective, we'd like to know whose.
If you are providing a response on behalf of others, please share their names.
The why shapes the how.
Motivations vary, and that is useful. Naming yours helps us design a strategy that feels honest and actionable.
What is your biggest motivation to engage in philanthropy?
Anything between the lines?
If there is nuance or context behind your choice, this is the place for it.
Other comments on your motivations.
If it were just you, what would you fund?
Set aside the organisation for a moment and rank your personal priorities.
Your top three areas of personal philanthropic interest.
Now, what should Apricot Capital fund?
This time, answer collectively for the organisation and its long-term identity.
Apricot Capital's top three areas of philanthropic interest.
Picture the year 2031.
What one sentence would you want people to say about Apricot Capital's philanthropic work?
What is the most important thing for Apricot Capital to be known for?
Anything to add?
If your view sits between options or somewhere else entirely, share it here.
Other comments on what Apricot Capital should be known for.
How loud should the work be?
Some philanthropists prefer quiet impact, while others view storytelling as part of the work.
To what extent should Apricot Capital talk about its work to the public?
Over the next five years, what funding approach should Apricot Capital prioritize?
Answer in the way that best reflects your perspective. There are no right or wrong choices.
Over the next five years, what funding approach should Apricot Capital prioritize?
What level of involvement should Apricot Capital have after making a grant?
Answer in the way that best reflects your perspective. There are no right or wrong choices.
What level of involvement should Apricot Capital have after making a grant?
Which evidence signals matter most when deciding whether to continue support?
Pick up to 3.
Which evidence signals matter most when deciding whether to continue support?
Pick up to 3.
What risk appetite should guide our philanthropic portfolio?
Answer in the way that best reflects your perspective. There are no right or wrong choices.
What risk appetite should guide our philanthropic portfolio?
Which communities or geographies in Singapore are underserved and should receive more attention?
Answer in the way that best reflects your perspective. There are no right or wrong choices.
Which communities or geographies in Singapore are underserved and should receive more attention?
How should Apricot Capital structure communication with grantees?
Answer in the way that best reflects your perspective. There are no right or wrong choices.
How should Apricot Capital structure communication with grantees?
If we could track only one success metric by 2031, what should it be and why?
Answer in the way that best reflects your perspective. There are no right or wrong choices.
If we could track only one success metric by 2031, what should it be and why?
Thank you. Your perspective shapes the work.
Your responses have been recorded and sent through the secure submission route for synthesis.